Aamir Khan in Beijing for a forum on Asia's cultural influence The Indian actor Aamir Khan attended a forum being held alongside the Conference on Dialogue of Asian Civilizations on Wednesday, at which he spoke about the role of film in bringing Asian cultures to the world. Asian Civilization Parade opens in Beijing A week-long Asian Civilization Parade showcasing the continent's diverse and charming civilizations kicks off in Beijing Thursday. China and Armenia, two old civilizations in the world There is a huge potential for boosting Sino-Armenian cooperation in economic and political fields.
Dialogue of Civilizations for a better Asia and World Asia was ever the home to three of the "Four great ancient civilizations," and Asian civilization won global fame for thousands of years of history.
Conference on Dialogue of Asian Civilizations - China plus
He introduces the concept: proprioception. That means selfperception. Peoples lack proprioception about the way we think. He proposes the idea of an open dialogue. This is different from the way most peoples discuss with each other. What we should try to do is to understand each others presuppositions.
That is not easy but we could start by trying, over and over again. Jul 11, Anya rated it it was amazing. If we keep on thinking that the world is there solely for our convenience, then we are going to exploit it in some other way, and we are going to make another problem somewhere. And that is a problem. The trouble is that some of those results that thought produces are considered to be very important and valuable. Thought produced the nation, and it says that the nation has an extremely high value, a supreme value, which overrides almost everything else.
The same may be said about religion. Therefore, freedom of thought is interfered with, because if the nation has high value it is necessary to continue to think that the nation has high value. The point of suspension is to help make proprioception possible, to create a mirror so that you can see the results of your thought. You have it inside yourself because your body acts as a mirror and you can see tensions arising in the body.
Also other people are a mirror, the group is a mirror. You have to see your intention. The love between Einstein and Bohr gradually evaporated because they could not communicate. However, if we can really communicate, then we will have fellowship, participation, friendship, and love, growing and growing. That would be the way. The question is really: do you see the necessity of this process?
If you see that it is absolutely necessary, then you have to do something. And perhaps in dialogue, when we have this very high energy of coherence, it might bring us beyond just being a group that could solve social problems. What has to be done, therefore; is to see this whole stream, and get to the source of it.
Somewhere, at the source of thought, it is being polluted—that is the suggestion. The suggestion is that knowledge—which is thought—is moving autonomously: it passes from one person to another. There is a whole pool of knowledge for the whole human race, like different computers that share a pool of knowledge.
The full text of the very influential paper by David Bohm, Donald Factor and Peter Garrett
This pool of thought has been developing for many thousands of years, and it is full of all sorts of content. This knowledge knows itself wrongly: it knows itself as doing nothing. The incoherence becomes clear—you fall when you want to ride. Physically, tacit knowledge is where the action is coming from. And physical change depends on changing the tacit response.
If you make an idol, it may stand in at first for some force which is greater than itself, or for some spiritual energy. But gradually the idol is taken to be it—literally; and therefore you give supreme value to that object. We could say that in a way we are worshiping our words and our thoughts, insofar as they claim to be descriptions or statements about reality just as it is.
We say, "I am my country. When you cross that boundary, you have hit me. Literal thought claims we are not doing it at all. Therefore, it is incoherent. Explicitly we have given supreme value to literal thought, while in fact we are also tacitly giving supreme value to participatory thought.
click here Literal thought took over in conscious awareness and made technology possible, and in many ways it was of tremendous advantage to do that. At the same time, participatory thought somehow went into the shade; it got eclipsed, but it remained underground. When they met another tribe, the very word suggested that the other tribe was not human.
You have all sorts of things to which you could give priority, and different people do it differently. However, if you give first priority to only those things, then you cannot be giving it to what may be unlimited. May 27, Melanie rated it it was amazing Shelves: old-favorites. David Bohm was a physicist by trade, but a man who had the capacity to abstract what he learned from his work into the larger arena of meaningful living.
To read Bohm is to learn to think and talk again. His way of being in the world doesn't allow for a person to avoid participating or being changed by that participation. If we separate ourselves from whatever is within the whole, we cannot take part in it This book is powerful, transformative - read at risk of being changed.
Apr 12, Johnny rated it it was amazing Shelves: philosophy , science. Apr 13, Seth Galbraith rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: activists and philosophers. Physicist David Bohm provides a uniquely european and scientific perspective into the paradoxes of identity which most westerners know only indirectly through translations and interpretations of asian scripture. Bohm suggests a mechanism for exploring thought and perhaps even solving global problems through dialogue in which groups of people suspend and examine their assumptions about who they are and what they believe.
- I recommend this book for:;
- Screening Methods in Pharmacology. Volume II!
- Reportar un comentario?
- Unfinished Business.
- New Developments in Lie Theory and Its Applications: Seventh Workshop on Lie Theory and Its Applications November 27- December 1, 2009 Cordoba, Argentina.
- International Training on Dialogue and Mediation ITDM 12222!
Mar 14, Phakin rated it really liked it. Need more time and more basic knowledge, this book was very tough. Yet I think it was quite interesting despite the fact that I didn't even understand how can "a dialogue" work especially in such specific situation. By the way, Bohm's explanation on the relation between a 'tacit knowledge' and our actions was so touching.
If I say that this book "convinced" me to keep on examining my "self" Was Bohm achieve his aims? Dec 30, Janne Asmala rated it really liked it Shelves: philosophy , art-of-hosting. A great collection of thought-provoking articles from a Western scientist on the nature of consciousness and the possibilities dialogue might open up for it's development. Apr 16, Kristina rated it did not like it Shelves: coaching.
This was very dry to me. I think Bohm is a physics professor writing about dialogue. What Jim Knight wrote in his book really sums up Bohms points concisely. Jan 28, Gene rated it liked it Shelves: presencing. A seminal work on the dynamics of human dialogue by one of the most original thinkers of the 20th century. Jul 30, Kenzie rated it it was amazing Shelves: philosophy , language. This is one of the best books I've ever read.
A friend recommended it to me based on my interest in Marshall Rosenberg's Nonviolent Communication , and just like that book, this one has been incredibly helpful to me. Bohm seemed to draw on a wide range of information, so that what he said connected with diverse areas of religion, philosophy, and science, but his writing was simple enough that no background was needed.
He adopted a conversational tone that made some complex ideas as clear as they This is one of the best books I've ever read. He adopted a conversational tone that made some complex ideas as clear as they could be. From what I gather, there are two main answers to the question. First, sitting in dialogue involves the inner work of watching our own thoughts, feelings, bodily sensations when our assumptions are challenged, until we see the absurdity and reductive currents of our own thoughts. Second, sitting in dialogue involves the outer work of making space for shared consciousness, even when what is shared is anger or hatred, so that the group can learn to look at something together and follow thought to its place of incoherence and collapse.
So a spirit of dialogue is necessary in order to come to a more open attention. If we can pay attention to the whole picture, we might begin to see things in more creative, hopeful ways. And if we pay attention in dialogue with others, then we might see surprising transformation in our world. On Dialogue is both a philosophical investigation and intensive breakdown of communication theory. Let's get this one out of the way first: D. Bohm is a physicist who also dabbles in other areas of interest.
The foreword illustrates him as an outsider, both to his field and his personal life in general. With that in mind, reading his didactic method of deconstructing communication and dialogue makes sense. I like critical and social theory as much as the next guy, but at times, D. Bohm expectatio On Dialogue is both a philosophical investigation and intensive breakdown of communication theory.
Bohm expectations of a "frictionless" communication can come off as idealistic.